Science doesn’t provide certainties, it provides surprises. And once again, the certainties of the lunar narrative have just been shaken like a module in full orbit. Because what a team of researchers has just confirmed with seismic tests and geophysical models is, to put it mildly, a bombshell for the official history of outer space. The Moon is not just a hollow rock, nor a lifeless ball of cheese: it has an inner core similar to Earth’s. Dense iron, a solid core… and a lot of silence from the agencies that for decades ruled out this possibility.
The discovery, published by the Institut de Physique du Globe in Paris and led by scientist Arthur Briaud, not only confirms that the Moon has a solid inner core. What’s disturbing is the implication: if the Earth’s satellite has a differentiated structure with a liquid outer core and a solid inner core, then the Moon is an active planetary body, and not a cosmic corpse as we’ve been sold since the last century.
Beyond the technical data—a density of 7.822 kg/m³, similar to that of the Earth’s core—what emerges from this research is the need to rewrite the entire lunar chapter. Because this is no small feat: a rotating metallic core can generate magnetic fields. And if there was magnetism, then there was an energetic past on the Moon, perhaps tectonic, internal activity, or something worse: past civilizations that left traces on its geology.
Exaggerated? Perhaps. Provocative? Definitely. But is it crazier than claiming for decades that the Moon had no core, without firm evidence? Because it’s worth remembering that in 2011, NASA had already suggested signs of a liquid core, but the discovery was buried under layers of technical reports and limited publicity. Today, thanks to a synthesis of data collected during Apollo missions and recent seismic simulations, the lunar model has changed forever.
The ironic—and predictable—thing is that neither NASA, nor the ESA, nor any of the space powers with flags planted in the regolith have come out to give an official conference on the matter. Silence is the sound science makes when it discovers something that bothers those in power.
And what about the lunar magnetic field, which disappeared more than 3 billion years ago? Why has no one talked about its sudden extinction or the possibility that this field was artificially induced? Briaud and his team ask uncomfortable questions, but are careful not to offer political answers. Their scientific work is rigorous, but like all data interpreted on this planet, it is subject to narratives. And narratives, as we well know, are more dangerous than meteorites.
The most alarming, or fascinating, thing is that this discovery revives all the theories that official astronomy has ridiculed for decades. The hypothesis that the Moon is a captured, or even artificial, body gains ground every time a layer of structural complexity is discovered beneath its gray crust.
Weren’t the seismic bells that rang during the Apollo missions simply rumblings? Could it be that we were listening to metallic echoes from the solid heart of a satellite too perfect to be natural?
While space agencies plan new moon landings (commercial, of course), while millionaires divide up the rights to exploit the satellite, free science—the kind that still survives in laboratories without Pentagon contracts—recalls once again that the Moon holds uncomfortable secrets. Not because they’re fanciful, but because they’re too real.
And if this news doesn’t make headlines on every website around the world, it’s not because it isn’t revolutionary. It’s because it reveals a truth that no one wants to hear: 384,000 kilometers from Earth, the Moon is still alive. And perhaps it knows more about us than we think.
The Moon Is Not Dead: The Core Confirms What NASA Kept Silent for Half a Century
That the Moon has a solid core isn’t just a scientific curiosity: it’s a direct slap in the face to 70 years of space narrative designed, funded, and sustained by agencies that sold certainties as if they were dogmas. Because if the Moon—that satellite we’ve been mentally orbiting since we were told it was an inert rock—turns out to have a dense, active, metallic heart, then the story of the dead sphere ends here. Or worse: it was never true.
The discovery, released by the Paris-based Globe Physics Institute, led by Arthur Briaud, is devastating. Not for what it says, but for what it confirms: that the lunar interior is dangerously similar to Earth’s. A liquid outer core. A solid inner core. High-density iron. In other words: a living structure, with dynamics, with geological memory. A Moon that could have had (or still has) a magnetic field. And if it had a magnetic field, it had an internal engine. And if it had an internal engine, it had history. And if it had history, it wasn’t the cold corpse sold to us in school textbooks.
We’re not talking about a minor fact. We’re talking about a planetary redefinition. Until now, the Moon was the poetic backdrop of the night sky, the most studied and least understood body in the solar system. A soulless rock. But now we know it beats. And there’s nothing more uncomfortable than a beating satellite.
The article published by Nature—the scientific Vatican of the modern world—confirms what many alternative researchers have been sensing since the 1970s: the Moon is not only geologically active, but structurally complex. Even more: intelligent, in the sense that its orbital behavior, its anomalous density, and its perfect symmetry with Earth are not easily explained by cosmic chance.
The model used by the French scientists was comparative, analyzing seismic data from the Apollo missions, satellite observations, and dynamic rotation simulations. Why France and not the United States? Because NASA long ago stopped searching for truths and became a public relations agency for private lunar bidding. It must be said: the business of silence is more profitable than the business of knowledge.
This discovery reactivates questions that have been in academic purgatory for decades: Why does the Moon have one side that always faces Earth? Why does its density not match its volume? Why does its formation remain a mystery without consensus? And why, when modules crashed onto its surface, did it ring like a bell for hours?
In 2006, researcher Paul Spudis had already warned that lunar internal models were “unsatisfactory.” In 2011, NASA leaked data suggesting a partially molten core, but buried the news in a bland press release. Today, the French confirm it with Cartesian elegance: the Moon is a planetary body with a solid, iron inner core, active and comparable to Earth’s.
But of course, we won’t see press conferences or hysterical headlines. Because this news, well told, undermines the lunar narrative of half a century. The one who said there was nothing more to discover up there. The one who claimed the space race ended when Armstrong planted a flag. The one who said the satellite was only a stepping stone to Mars, but never a mystery in itself.
The Moon is annoying. Because it doesn’t fit. Because it orbits too well. Because its origin is too improbable. Because its physical anomalies defy models. And now, with a solid core confirmed, there’s a painful certainty: we were lied to. Or at least, we were told a half-truth.
This isn’t just planetary geology. This is celestial geopolitics. And the science that bothers us, as always, ends up becoming a footnote.
The Moon has a solid core. And the official story: a black hole in the middle of its chest.
English 
Spanish 