More

    The Silenced Infants Experiment: When Frederick II Searched for God’s Language

    The case of Frederick II is not unique, but it is pioneering. Centuries later, behavioral psychologists like Watson and Skinner also attempted to mold the human mind as if it were clay. In the 20th century, history would repeat its cruel experiment with the babies of Nazism, Soviet orphanages, and newborn nurseries in Romania

    In the 13th century—an age marked by crusading zeal, the rise of the Inquisition, and the political turbulence of medieval Europe—Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II of Hohenstaufen conducted one of the most disturbing scientific experiments in Western history. It rarely appears in school textbooks, not because it is apocryphal, but because it exposes an uncomfortable truth about the relationship between power, knowledge, and the human soul.

    Frederick II, a cultured and multilingual monarch educated by Arab and Jewish scholars, was consumed by a question that had fascinated philosophers since antiquity:
    What is the original language of humanity?
    Was it Hebrew? Greek? Latin? Arabic? Or a primordial, innate language embedded in the human spirit?

    To answer this question, Frederick devised an unprecedented experiment—one that today would be considered a crime against humanity.


    A Voiceless Orphanage: The Emperor’s Laboratory

    Frederick ordered a group of newborns—either orphans or children surrendered to the state—to be raised in complete verbal isolation. Nurses were permitted to feed and clean them, but they were strictly forbidden to speak, sing, smile, or interact in any emotional capacity.

    The hypothesis was horrifyingly simple:
    If language is innate, the first words spoken by these children would reveal the original, divine tongue.

    But nothing emerged.

    Not Hebrew.
    Not Greek.
    Not any proto-language.

    Instead, the infants died, one by one—victims not of hunger, but of silence, emotional deprivation, and the absence of human affection.

    Franciscan chronicler Salimbene of Parma, who documented the case decades later, wrote:

    “The children could not live without clapping, joyful gestures, or words of tenderness.”

    The experiment did not reveal the language of God.
    It revealed something far more devastating:
    without love, human life cannot survive.


    An Emperor of Reason… and Cruelty

    Frederick II was not a barbaric ruler. He was a rationalist centuries ahead of his time—an astronomer, naturalist, and philosopher who authored De Arte Venandi cum Avibus, a pioneering treatise on animal behavior. He patronized scholars across three religions and defied the Church’s dogmatic authority.

    But this makes the paradox even more brutal:
    A man devoted to knowledge became capable of the cruelest scientific delusion.

    This is the central lesson of his experiment:
    Science without conscience becomes barbarism.


    A Precedent for Dark Science

    Frederick’s experiment was the first documented linguistic deprivation study in history. Tragically, it would not be the last.

    Centuries later, similar horrors were repeated:

    • in behaviorist experiments influenced by Watson and Skinner,
    • in Nazi “racial science,”
    • in Soviet orphanages,
    • in the neglected nurseries of Communist Romania.

    In every case, the result was identical:
    Language cannot emerge without affection.
    Human development collapses without emotional contact.

    Frederick sought the original language of the soul.
    What he discovered—unintentionally—was a universal law of humanity:
    Speech is born from relationship, not isolation.


    What If the Children Had Spoken?

    Some romanticize the idea that, had they survived, the infants might have spoken an extinct or divine language. But this fantasy dissolves under the weight of reality. The experiment does not leave us a linguistic miracle—it leaves us an ethical warning:

    All knowledge that disregards life ends up devouring itself.

    In an age when Artificial Intelligence learns to speak faster than a newborn, the experiment of Frederick II reminds us of something essential:
    language is not a technical product—it is an emotional one.


    Echoes in Modern Times

    Frederick II died in 1250. But his experiment resonates today in more subtle forms:

    • in the technologized classroom that replaces human contact with screens,
    • in AI systems trained to simulate empathy,
    • in scientific pursuits that prioritize output over ethics.

    The emperor never discovered God’s language.
    What he uncovered—tragically—is that the purest human language is not spoken.
    It is felt.

    If a divine language ever existed, it was probably whispered not by scholars or emperors, but by a mother to her newborn—
    a language made not of words, but of tenderness.

    Abel
    Abelhttps://codigoabel.com
    Journalist, analyst, and researcher with a particular focus on geopolitics, economics, sports, and phenomena that defy conventional logic. Through Código Abel, I merge my work experience of more than two decades in various journalistic sources with my personal interests and tastes, aiming to offer a unique vision of the world. My work is based on critical analysis, fact-checking, and the exploration of connections that often go unnoticed in traditional media.

    Latest articles

    spot_imgspot_img

    Related articles

    spot_imgspot_img
    en_USEnglish