At the heart of Major League Baseball (MLB) competition in the United States, a fundamental dilemma arises that redefines the way teams approach the game. This dilemma arises in the dichotomy and supposed difference between the sabermetrics of teams from regional or small markets, which we will call “poor” in the context of this article, and the sabermetrics of franchises from global or international markets, which we will identify as “rich.”
We must understand something fundamental: no team in the Major Leagues is poor, because every market in the world’s largest sports economy (the United States) has greater potential than any average country. Furthermore, the fundamental question is not how much money an owner or corporation has, but how much money each of the 30 MLB franchises manages in their internal management, which is well regulated by the relevant authorities and MLB itself.
In other words, let’s give an example: the prestigious Ferrari car brand can buy an MLB team, but that doesn’t mean all of Ferrari’s money or assets are there. Understanding this is basic economics. In any case, the prestige of the Ferrari brand is the main value that gives greater value to the acquired baseball franchise because Ferrari is a successful business model, but the economic reality of the acquired team will be dictated by its market.
The Origin of Sabermetrics and the Reasons for Its Expansion
The sabermetrics revolution in baseball began with general manager Billy Beane and the Oakland Athletics at the beginning of the millennium. They were pioneers in taking the risk of using advanced metrics to optimize their roster costs, recruiting players undervalued by the system at affordable prices.
Although the Athletics failed to win a World Series that season and still haven’t, they left an indelible mark by reinventing the way professional baseball is played. However, his sabermetric model was copied, and in some cases even improved, by other franchises in subsequent years. These were “rich” teams that didn’t actually have financial problems or such limited or tight budgets. So what changed sabermetrics? Because the result wasn’t just that the “poor” were competing head-to-head against the rich, but that everyone now had sabermetric departments.
What began as a strategy to allow small teams to compete on a level playing field became a weapon adopted by larger, more historic teams as well. Now, franchises like the Dodgers, Yankees, and Red Sox are applying sabermetrics while continuing to shell out astronomical sums for the best players in multimillion-dollar contracts.
So much so that at the end of Billy Beane’s season with the Athletics, one of the first teams to try to bring him into the fold was the Red Sox, who wanted to apply this advanced metrics model, knowing they had an elite sports budget.
So the question arises: what is the key to competitiveness in modern baseball? Both poor and rich teams use sabermetrics, but the financial disparity persists. Even rich teams now have larger and more experienced sabermetrics departments.
It’s clear that winning with sabermetrics is no longer enough (and it never was), as all teams use it. Nor can we rely exclusively on money, as recently demonstrated by the San Diego Padres, who, despite investing significantly in recent years, failed to make the playoffs in 2023. If you don’t invest wisely, money slips away like water from your hands.
The key: human value and athletic talent
The key to success in contemporary baseball lies in many things, as it always has. It involves investing wisely. Sabermetrics plays a crucial role in providing valuable data, but the correct interpretation of this data is essential. It’s not just about having information, but knowing how to use it strategically to make informed or scientifically based decisions.
Furthermore, the importance of momentum is highlighted. Players’ performance at crucial moments of the season can make all the difference. The stars of this sport will continue to be stars, and MLB must help ensure that stars continue to emerge. The day there are no more stars in baseball, then it will cease to be a “show,” and then big capital will no longer be available to invest.
The work of the coaching staff, made up of managers and coaches, becomes vitally important. Getting the best out of players and ensuring they give their best in decisive moments is a skill that goes beyond statistics. Intuition, whether it’s seeing something about a player or reinterpreting a statistic, remains the secret to success. Intuition in business and intuition in sports have much more in common than we might initially imagine.
Modern baseball, like that of yesteryear, is won solely with sabermetrics or exclusively with financial resources. The true formula for success lies in the intelligent combination of the two. Poor teams can compete if they apply sabermetrics astutely, while wealthy teams must balance their financial power with data-driven strategic decision-making, because if you want to ruin a great player, all you have to do is turn him into a multimillionaire—and I’m referring to the facts.
Ultimately, baseball is a game that goes beyond numbers and million-dollar contracts. It’s a sport where intelligence, strategy, and adaptability are as crucial as individual talent. In the sabermetric dilemma between the rich and the poor, the true victory lies in the synthesis of knowledge and cunning that has defined baseball since its origins. It’s still the same sport as always, only now it’s being marketed differently because the customer has changed and will continue to change.
English 
Spanish 